Controversy spurred by revelations of National Security Agency spying on U.S. citizens has curled back to lax privacy provisions on major technology giants such as Google and Yahoo. They also lead to a very different kind of recommendations for protecting consumer and citizen privacy.
Georgetown University Professor Abraham Newman writes in Foreign Affairs that Silicon Valley data masters protest too much about routine NSA poking around. "The companies pledge to step up privacy protections," Newman says, "but such protections run counter to the business model and public policy agenda that tech companies have pursued for decades."
"For years, U.S. information technology firms have actively backed weak privacy rules that let them collect massive amounts of personal data," Newman explains. "That strategy enable the companies to work their way into every corner of consumers' lives and gave them a competitive edge internationally. These same policies, however, have come back to haunt IT firms. Lax rules created fertile ground for NSA snooping."
Newman says U.S. officials, including the Obama administration, have acquiesced to self-regulation by American IT giants. "Until this year, the self-regulation strategy paid off," Newman writes. "With their nearly unrestricted access to U.S. consumer data, IT companies were able to mine information in ways that many of their European competitors could never imagine."